<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Siloing and AdSense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.memwg.com/seo-siloing-and-adsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.memwg.com/seo-siloing-and-adsense/</link>
	<description>Eric Giguere&#039;s AdSense Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candles</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/seo-siloing-and-adsense/comment-page-1/#comment-4904</link>
		<dc:creator>Candles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://memwg.com/general/seo-siloing-and-adsense/#comment-4904</guid>
		<description>This is interesting, According to several of your articles, and others you mention, it would appear (at least to me) that WP missed out by requiring /category/ or /topic/ or /something/ as a designator for category pages. Otherwise there would be almost a default siloing effect.

What concerns me is the idea of having to create a separate index page for a category along with the default category page that already exists. I have one site with 50+ categories (and more to come), so that seems out of the question.

I found, and did some experimentation with another plugin from UrbanGiraffe.com called Advanced Permalinks. It allows you to &quot;drop&quot; that designator. So instead of blog.com/category/whatever as the category page, it allows you to define blog.com/whatever. Seems like a possible workaround, though it would probably require a separate category.php page to be tailored to work well.

I suppose there&#039;s also a way to accomplish the same effect using .htaccess, but I haven&#039;t worked that out yet.

Thanks for the great articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, According to several of your articles, and others you mention, it would appear (at least to me) that WP missed out by requiring /category/ or /topic/ or /something/ as a designator for category pages. Otherwise there would be almost a default siloing effect.</p>
<p>What concerns me is the idea of having to create a separate index page for a category along with the default category page that already exists. I have one site with 50+ categories (and more to come), so that seems out of the question.</p>
<p>I found, and did some experimentation with another plugin from UrbanGiraffe.com called Advanced Permalinks. It allows you to &#8220;drop&#8221; that designator. So instead of blog.com/category/whatever as the category page, it allows you to define blog.com/whatever. Seems like a possible workaround, though it would probably require a separate category.php page to be tailored to work well.</p>
<p>I suppose there&#8217;s also a way to accomplish the same effect using .htaccess, but I haven&#8217;t worked that out yet.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/seo-siloing-and-adsense/comment-page-1/#comment-4890</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://memwg.com/general/seo-siloing-and-adsense/#comment-4890</guid>
		<description>Search engines can definitely tell the difference.

There is a danger in going too deep with categories and such -- it takes longer for sites to be crawled deeply. That&#039;s why you need to get quality backlinks that link directly to your deep content and not just the home page or the categories.

Repeating keywords isn&#039;t necessarily bad if it&#039;s done in a logical manner. 

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search engines can definitely tell the difference.</p>
<p>There is a danger in going too deep with categories and such &#8212; it takes longer for sites to be crawled deeply. That&#8217;s why you need to get quality backlinks that link directly to your deep content and not just the home page or the categories.</p>
<p>Repeating keywords isn&#8217;t necessarily bad if it&#8217;s done in a logical manner. </p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/seo-siloing-and-adsense/comment-page-1/#comment-4869</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://memwg.com/general/seo-siloing-and-adsense/#comment-4869</guid>
		<description>I found this article interesting, and it fits in with what I&#039;ve discovered (by accident) on my own. I just have one question.

Are you suggesting URLs should be organized as

domain.com/topkeyword/keyword1-keyword2

instead of

domain-com/topkeyword-keyword1-keyword2?

I&#039;ve often wondered if the search engines could tell the difference between the 2. And, what if the top keyword is repeated in the title?

For example, let&#039;s look at a dog blog for instance. Let&#039;s take a dog site for example. Would it be better to have a URL organized as

dogblog.com/poodle/poodle-training-secrets

or

dogblog.com/poodle-training-secrets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this article interesting, and it fits in with what I&#8217;ve discovered (by accident) on my own. I just have one question.</p>
<p>Are you suggesting URLs should be organized as</p>
<p>domain.com/topkeyword/keyword1-keyword2</p>
<p>instead of</p>
<p>domain-com/topkeyword-keyword1-keyword2?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often wondered if the search engines could tell the difference between the 2. And, what if the top keyword is repeated in the title?</p>
<p>For example, let&#8217;s look at a dog blog for instance. Let&#8217;s take a dog site for example. Would it be better to have a URL organized as</p>
<p>dogblog.com/poodle/poodle-training-secrets</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>dogblog.com/poodle-training-secrets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

