Comments on: More Flexible (And Better Paying?) Cost Per Action Google Referrals http://www.memwg.com/more-flexible-and-better-paying-cost-per-action-google-referrals/ Eric Giguere's AdSense Tips Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:55:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Eric Giguere http://www.memwg.com/more-flexible-and-better-paying-cost-per-action-google-referrals/comment-page-1/#comment-473 Eric Giguere Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:47:18 +0000 http://www.memwg.com/more-flexible-and-better-paying-cost-per-action-google-referrals/#comment-473 It's one of my biggest complaints about the referral program, and something I sent an email to Google about when they first introduced them. I wish they'd use a plain text link, but they said they weren't planning on it anytime soon. Seems silly to me. It’s one of my biggest complaints about the referral program, and something I sent an email to Google about when they first introduced them. I wish they’d use a plain text link, but they said they weren’t planning on it anytime soon. Seems silly to me.

]]> By: Chuck http://www.memwg.com/more-flexible-and-better-paying-cost-per-action-google-referrals/comment-page-1/#comment-468 Chuck Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:22:35 +0000 http://www.memwg.com/more-flexible-and-better-paying-cost-per-action-google-referrals/#comment-468 I'm still very disappointed that the brains at Google have shown a complete lack of creativity in simply assigning us affiliate tracking ID which can be placed into naturally-formatted links, instead of those lame banners and junky Java text links. I realize they are scared of spam-monsters hijacking their products...but this is a little ridiculous. I’m still very disappointed that the brains at Google have shown a complete lack of creativity in simply assigning us affiliate tracking ID which can be placed into naturally-formatted links, instead of those lame banners and junky Java text links.

I realize they are scared of spam-monsters hijacking their products…but this is a little ridiculous.

]]>