<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Depenalization &#8211; Steps 1 to 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/</link>
	<description>Google AdSense Tips and Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:47:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Depenalization Paying Off&#8230; &#124; The Unofficial AdSense Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5740</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Depenalization Paying Off&#8230; &#124; The Unofficial AdSense Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5740</guid>
		<description>[...] looks like my Google depenalization efforts are paying off. As of today, The Unofficial AdSense Blog has jumped up about 700 spots in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looks like my Google depenalization efforts are paying off. As of today, The Unofficial AdSense Blog has jumped up about 700 spots in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5734</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5734</guid>
		<description>I never understood why Google penalizes webmasters who sell links. In that way, somehow, Google places itself in a position of a market monopolist. 

Anyway, thank you for this very useful post.

Regards,
Bob
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.AdNetworksForum.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood why Google penalizes webmasters who sell links. In that way, somehow, Google places itself in a position of a market monopolist. </p>
<p>Anyway, thank you for this very useful post.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Bob<br />
<a href="http://www.AdNetworksForum.com"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5731</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5731</guid>
		<description>Google doesn&#039;t want paid links messing with PageRank, so paid links need to be &quot;nofollow&quot; or else generated dynamically through JavaScript.

As for the comments, those steps were taken to ensure that no links to bad places make their way into this blog. An active blog can be hard to monitor that way, that&#039;s all.

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google doesn&#8217;t want paid links messing with PageRank, so paid links need to be &#8220;nofollow&#8221; or else generated dynamically through JavaScript.</p>
<p>As for the comments, those steps were taken to ensure that no links to bad places make their way into this blog. An active blog can be hard to monitor that way, that&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palapple</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5730</link>
		<dc:creator>Palapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5730</guid>
		<description>I am interested if you can explain the rationale behind these three actions?
Link text ads means including Adsense itself, why shall Google penalize her own advertising tools?
I believe point (2) and (3) are due to spamming or irrelevant comments. Else I can&#039;t see why an active blog post with a lot of comments will jeopardize its standing in search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested if you can explain the rationale behind these three actions?<br />
Link text ads means including Adsense itself, why shall Google penalize her own advertising tools?<br />
I believe point (2) and (3) are due to spamming or irrelevant comments. Else I can&#8217;t see why an active blog post with a lot of comments will jeopardize its standing in search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Saxe</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Saxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>So much for the newbie to learn about blogging and Google, glad to have come by your site. I will take a few of your suggestions and put them in place and see how it all pans out and will let you know the outcome.
Respectfully,
Dr Saxe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for the newbie to learn about blogging and Google, glad to have come by your site. I will take a few of your suggestions and put them in place and see how it all pans out and will let you know the outcome.<br />
Respectfully,<br />
Dr Saxe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch the Free Traffic Secrets Videos &#124; The Unofficial AdSense Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5684</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch the Free Traffic Secrets Videos &#124; The Unofficial AdSense Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5684</guid>
		<description>[...] plugins for easily editing old posts? I have to make some changes to this blog as part of my depenalization effort, but the thought of editing all those posts through the standard WordPress admin console is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plugins for easily editing old posts? I have to make some changes to this blog as part of my depenalization effort, but the thought of editing all those posts through the standard WordPress admin console is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray the Domain Buyer</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5678</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray the Domain Buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5678</guid>
		<description>sorry to be so dumb, but what do you mean by &#039;text link ads&#039;?

do you mean by that company text-link-ads [DOT... you know]? 
Or do you mean something else?   doesn&#039;t google adsense itself provide text link ads?  what about things like for CJ products/advertisers -- is that also verboten now?

I thought you could recommend something and send someone to a product without being penalized -- or is it actually the opposite? 

I.e, is google penalizing everyone who dares to be an affiliate for anyone/any program OTHER than google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry to be so dumb, but what do you mean by &#8216;text link ads&#8217;?</p>
<p>do you mean by that company text-link-ads [DOT... you know]?<br />
Or do you mean something else?   doesn&#8217;t google adsense itself provide text link ads?  what about things like for CJ products/advertisers &#8212; is that also verboten now?</p>
<p>I thought you could recommend something and send someone to a product without being penalized &#8212; or is it actually the opposite? </p>
<p>I.e, is google penalizing everyone who dares to be an affiliate for anyone/any program OTHER than google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5677</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5677</guid>
		<description>BTW, Chuck, keeping your blogs on full moderation is probably a good idea for &quot;dofollow&quot;. I should probably revert back to that model myself, which would triply ensure that no spammy comments make it in. It doesn&#039;t lend itself to extended, immediate discussions, though, which is why I&#039;ve avoided it... but maybe that&#039;s not worth it anymore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, Chuck, keeping your blogs on full moderation is probably a good idea for &#8220;dofollow&#8221;. I should probably revert back to that model myself, which would triply ensure that no spammy comments make it in. It doesn&#8217;t lend itself to extended, immediate discussions, though, which is why I&#8217;ve avoided it&#8230; but maybe that&#8217;s not worth it anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5675</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5675</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly a pain, that&#039;s for sure. I &lt;i&gt;think&lt;/i&gt; the text link ads are the main cause of my pain, but I&#039;m not sure of course... won&#039;t know until I get some response back on my reinclusion request.

I agree with your comments about competing with the top sites... there are so many sites out there that get links back to them through paid means it&#039;s hard for new sites to get ranked in the top 10. You end up being forced to try to get links back in a similar fashion....

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly a pain, that&#8217;s for sure. I <i>think</i> the text link ads are the main cause of my pain, but I&#8217;m not sure of course&#8230; won&#8217;t know until I get some response back on my reinclusion request.</p>
<p>I agree with your comments about competing with the top sites&#8230; there are so many sites out there that get links back to them through paid means it&#8217;s hard for new sites to get ranked in the top 10. You end up being forced to try to get links back in a similar fashion&#8230;.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/google-depenalization-steps-1-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=1390#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t seem fair, does it? I love Google on many levels, and hate them on a few. But it&#039;s so hard to keep up with every little thing. I&#039;ve never heard that leaving comments open on older posts is a bad thing. I have several do-follow blogs now and I have left them all wide open. Of course, this mean a lot of spam, but I&#039;m living with it. I still don&#039;t let any junk get through since I&#039;m set up for manual approval on everything. 

And I&#039;m really uncomfortable selling text ads...unless they have the no-follow attribute in place. I won&#039;t be selling any new ads without that. 

However, I will admit that I still buy links now and again, in various forms. Why? When trying to get my second biggest site ranked (and this is truly an excellent site...if not the very best in the genre, then certainly in the top 5), I look at the top-ranked site for the top keyword phrase...and they have 11,100 backlinks according to Yahoo (564 according to G). There&#039;s NO WAY those 11K are organic backlinks. I have no chance of competing if I sit and wait for organic backlinks...although I do get a nice stream of them on an ongoing basis. I HATE having to spend time trying to get ranked instead of focusing on development of new content. But until the search engines get it together and find a way to rank sites based on merit instead of whatever manipulation critera gets around their filters...I will have to play the game to some degree as well. Maybe someday...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t seem fair, does it? I love Google on many levels, and hate them on a few. But it&#8217;s so hard to keep up with every little thing. I&#8217;ve never heard that leaving comments open on older posts is a bad thing. I have several do-follow blogs now and I have left them all wide open. Of course, this mean a lot of spam, but I&#8217;m living with it. I still don&#8217;t let any junk get through since I&#8217;m set up for manual approval on everything. </p>
<p>And I&#8217;m really uncomfortable selling text ads&#8230;unless they have the no-follow attribute in place. I won&#8217;t be selling any new ads without that. </p>
<p>However, I will admit that I still buy links now and again, in various forms. Why? When trying to get my second biggest site ranked (and this is truly an excellent site&#8230;if not the very best in the genre, then certainly in the top 5), I look at the top-ranked site for the top keyword phrase&#8230;and they have 11,100 backlinks according to Yahoo (564 according to G). There&#8217;s NO WAY those 11K are organic backlinks. I have no chance of competing if I sit and wait for organic backlinks&#8230;although I do get a nice stream of them on an ongoing basis. I HATE having to spend time trying to get ranked instead of focusing on development of new content. But until the search engines get it together and find a way to rank sites based on merit instead of whatever manipulation critera gets around their filters&#8230;I will have to play the game to some degree as well. Maybe someday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/27 queries in 0.035 seconds using disk

Served from: www.memwg.com @ 2010-07-29 12:55:14 -->