<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Bans Deceptive AdSense Ad Placements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/</link>
	<description>Eric Giguere&#039;s AdSense Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candles</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4871</link>
		<dc:creator>Candles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/#comment-4871</guid>
		<description>I, too, noticed something weird about Adsense over the last month. Prior to early March I was probably averaging 15-25 cente per click overall. Then, suddenly, it dropped down to less than 10 cents per click. That went on until yesterday when it jumped back up to the previous level. I hope it sticks.

Regarding the &quot;crackdown&quot; - so, is Google now going to quit recommending the large link blocks at the top of articles (which always seemed to me like trying to &quot;fool&quot; visitors into thinking it&#039;s a list of resources)? Or, are they going to ban 250x250 image/video blocks (which often look like an embedded video)? Pot, meet kettle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, noticed something weird about Adsense over the last month. Prior to early March I was probably averaging 15-25 cente per click overall. Then, suddenly, it dropped down to less than 10 cents per click. That went on until yesterday when it jumped back up to the previous level. I hope it sticks.</p>
<p>Regarding the &#8220;crackdown&#8221; &#8211; so, is Google now going to quit recommending the large link blocks at the top of articles (which always seemed to me like trying to &#8220;fool&#8221; visitors into thinking it&#8217;s a list of resources)? Or, are they going to ban 250&#215;250 image/video blocks (which often look like an embedded video)? Pot, meet kettle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4836</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/#comment-4836</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not the only one who&#039;s complained of this. Some people are wondering if it&#039;s an indication of a slowdown in online advertising spending as the US economy worsens. Of course, Google&#039;s always tweaking things, too, so who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not the only one who&#8217;s complained of this. Some people are wondering if it&#8217;s an indication of a slowdown in online advertising spending as the US economy worsens. Of course, Google&#8217;s always tweaking things, too, so who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living off Dividends</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4832</link>
		<dc:creator>Living off Dividends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/#comment-4832</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen severe fluctuations in my Adsense revenue in March. the amount per click totally dropped to 3 cents someday, but then rebounded to $1+ on others. pretty strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen severe fluctuations in my Adsense revenue in March. the amount per click totally dropped to 3 cents someday, but then rebounded to $1+ on others. pretty strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-03-31 &#124; Cosmos</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4827</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-03-31 &#124; Cosmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/#comment-4827</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Bans Deceptive AdSense Ad Placements It took them long enough, but Google has finally put the kabosh on deceptive ad placements. Specifically &#8230; (tags: marketing) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Bans Deceptive AdSense Ad Placements It took them long enough, but Google has finally put the kabosh on deceptive ad placements. Specifically &#8230; (tags: marketing) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chintan</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4776</link>
		<dc:creator>Chintan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/#comment-4776</guid>
		<description>the best is the one with title &quot;1 New Message&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the best is the one with title &#8220;1 New Message&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Bans Deceptive Ad Blending and Deceptive Headings</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4775</link>
		<dc:creator>8 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Bans Deceptive Ad Blending and Deceptive Headings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/deceptive-ads/#comment-4775</guid>
		<description>[...] kinds of deceptive ad blending: Another look at optimizations. I have some further discussion on my AdSense blog, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kinds of deceptive ad blending: Another look at optimizations. I have some further discussion on my AdSense blog, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

