<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdSense Video Units Are Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/</link>
	<description>Eric Giguere&#039;s AdSense Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poe</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9701</link>
		<dc:creator>Poe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9701</guid>
		<description>They were bad idea. It is true that the internet went very fancy and modern. But who will click and watch a video about some ads. :) They weren&#039;t simple thats why Adsense video ads didn&#039;t success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were bad idea. It is true that the internet went very fancy and modern. But who will click and watch a video about some ads. <img src='http://www.memwg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  They weren&#8217;t simple thats why Adsense video ads didn&#8217;t success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9435</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9435</guid>
		<description>Good riddance. I always felt that they were a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good riddance. I always felt that they were a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoFollow Webmaster Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9366</link>
		<dc:creator>DoFollow Webmaster Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9366</guid>
		<description>I saw a few people using Googles Adsense Video units, but wasn&#039;t really impressed by them. I think Google decided to remove them, as they probably weren&#039;t being used as Google predicted.

Still gotta give Google props for trying something that not alot of advertising networks do.

Regards,
Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a few people using Googles Adsense Video units, but wasn&#8217;t really impressed by them. I think Google decided to remove them, as they probably weren&#8217;t being used as Google predicted.</p>
<p>Still gotta give Google props for trying something that not alot of advertising networks do.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smartvergin</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9180</link>
		<dc:creator>smartvergin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9180</guid>
		<description>Good I tried using it when it first came out none of the videos were site related, I pulled all ads and went with what works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good I tried using it when it first came out none of the videos were site related, I pulled all ads and went with what works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paukenerguss</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9140</link>
		<dc:creator>Paukenerguss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9140</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, thank you. I also think that the most video ads have bad conversation rates...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, thank you. I also think that the most video ads have bad conversation rates&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anraiki</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9101</link>
		<dc:creator>Anraiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9101</guid>
		<description>I think Video Advertising on You tube could have been properly handled if the advertiser could choose a relevant video to their relevant product.

But not only that allow the &quot;Video Owner&quot; gain a profit on it as well. However, they need to allow consent if they want to have some advertising on their video.

But like I said, it needs to be properly executed, and google doesn&#039;t do things &quot;manually&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Video Advertising on You tube could have been properly handled if the advertiser could choose a relevant video to their relevant product.</p>
<p>But not only that allow the &#8220;Video Owner&#8221; gain a profit on it as well. However, they need to allow consent if they want to have some advertising on their video.</p>
<p>But like I said, it needs to be properly executed, and google doesn&#8217;t do things &#8220;manually&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9099</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9099</guid>
		<description>It is good idea to let go of this product, maybe Google would come up with something better in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good idea to let go of this product, maybe Google would come up with something better in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brickmug44</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9074</link>
		<dc:creator>brickmug44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9074</guid>
		<description>The ppc for a google video unit is very very low. I have google vid units</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ppc for a google video unit is very very low. I have google vid units</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macbook Dreamer</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9066</link>
		<dc:creator>Macbook Dreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9066</guid>
		<description>@Rich: Adsense video units are video ads, normally you see or publish image or text ads on sites, but with video units, u could have videos as ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rich: Adsense video units are video ads, normally you see or publish image or text ads on sites, but with video units, u could have videos as ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tx refinance</title>
		<link>http://www.memwg.com/adsense-video-units-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9059</link>
		<dc:creator>tx refinance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memwg.com/?p=3050#comment-9059</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of smart people at Google, but they still havenâ€™t come up with anything that comes even near to matching the success of the original</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of smart people at Google, but they still havenâ€™t come up with anything that comes even near to matching the success of the original</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

